The U.S. House of Representatives passed a budget bill imposing a 10-year moratorium on state-level regulations of artificial intelligence, stirring significant debate.
Proponents argue the moratorium prevents a fragmented regulatory environment that could hinder innovation, while critics warn it leaves consumers and economies vulnerable.
The provision is part of a Republican effort to centralize AI control federally, with some GOP members and Democrats expressing concerns about federal overreach and state autonomy.
Senator Marsha Blackburn is a notable opponent, advocating for state rights to address local needs and protect against AI misuse until federal guidelines are established.
The bill faces uncertainty in the Senate due to bipartisan opposition, highlighting ongoing tensions between state and federal governance of rapidly evolving technology.
Big tech vendors seek relief from varying state laws on AI and data privacy, with Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act proposing a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws.
The U.S. House passed a tax and domestic policy bill by a narrow margin, which includes a provision to halt state enforcement of AI regulations.
Despite concerns over a chaotic patchwork of laws, progress on federal data privacy legislation remains slow, with previous attempts failing to pass.
Texas has secured substantial settlements against Google and Meta for violating user data privacy, signaling a strict state approach to tech regulation.
Industry experts warn that a lack of cohesive federal regulations may hinder accountability for AI vendors, emphasizing the need for appropriate legal frameworks.