Federal – ABCDQI

Fragmented AI Laws Hindering U.S. Federal IT Modernization

Congress is considering a 10-year moratorium on state and local AI laws to prevent regulatory fragmentation.
Inconsistent state AI regulations could increase compliance costs and hinder IT modernization across federal agencies.
The federal government relies on commercial off-the-shelf technologies for system modernization in various departments.
A moratorium would allow Congress to establish a unified national framework while promoting $500 million in federal IT investments.
Without a cohesive approach, the U.S. risks losing its competitive edge in innovation, service delivery, and national security.

Inconsistent state regulations on AI create a complex landscape that hinders innovation and business operations across the U.S.
A proposed 10-year moratorium on state and local AI regulations is aimed at fostering uniformity and preventing economic disadvantage.
Varied regulatory requirements impose significant burdens, particularly on small businesses, which struggle to comply with multiple legal frameworks.
Compared to nations like China and regions like the EU, the U.S. risks falling behind without a coherent national AI strategy that encourages innovation.
A unified regulatory approach is essential for building consumer trust, boosting economic growth, and ensuring the U.S. maintains its leadership in AI development.

DOGE has introduced various AI tools at government agencies in recent months.
The US Army utilizes CamoGPT to remove DEI-related language from training materials.
The General Services Administration launched "GSAi," a chatbot for enhancing agency productivity.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) accessed AutoRIF software for potential mass firings.
These tools aim to streamline processes and manage workforce issues within federal agencies.