- A bill by Wisconsin lawmakers proposes using AI for courtroom interpretation to assist non-English-speaking defendants, addressing a shortage of certified human interpreters.
- Proponents claim this could save money and expedite court proceedings, with the potential for Wisconsin to become the first state to adopt AI interpreters in a courtroom setting.
- Critics worry AI may not meet legal standards for accuracy and neutrality, raising concerns about constitutional protections and accountability in critical legal contexts.
- Current Wisconsin law mandates using certified human interpreters, with significant budget increases in recent years for such services amid high demand for various languages.
- The legislation does not mandate AI use, allowing counties the option while suggesting other solutions like increasing funding for human interpreters to address shortages.